
Hudud laws would have been more acceptable if the countries that implement them are shining examples of advancing and progressive nations. Somehow it appears that only nations that are deemed as failed states and are governed by dictatorial leadership that favoured hudud laws. In those countries where hudud laws were implemented, news of the barbaric punishments have been meted out primarily to seemingly "timid" lawbreakers, such as teenage rape victims and young gay boys. It's not that they are beheading and stoning serial killers and the many alleged "
terrorists that have hijacked Islam".
Let's face reality. If the majority of muslims in Malaysia really wanted hudud laws, it would have been implemented long ago.
The implementation of an Islamic state is not possible, with
Malaysia's secular constitution but at least shades of hudud would have been present.
It is very naive if the hudud supporters believed that the Free People humbly decline hudud laws because we do not wish to have armless thieves and stoned adultress. More potent danger lies in the laws against
blasphemers against Islam, as religious clerics would yield great unquestioned power.
For example, the Persatuan Ulama2 Malaysia (PUM) recently made a police report against Malaysiakini for allegedly defaming Islam. I can only imagine, that one of their wet dreams would be, if hudud laws are present, to drag Malaysiakini's staff out to public stadiums and behead them shouting Allahu Akhbar!
Hudud laws can be made into a very powerful weapon to destroy humanity and the country. Not that the laws are not good. It's that the
laws can be abused since we are never allowed to question, yet alone challenge, the decisions and opinions of the religious clerics.
Hudud laws give great unchallenged powers to religious clerics.We can learn from
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (19 May 1881–10 November 1938). He was a Turkish army officer, revolutionary statesman, and founder of the Republic of Turkey as well as its first President.
As the first President of Turkey, Atatürk embarked upon a major programme of political, economic and cultural reforms. An admirer of the Enlightenment, Atatürk sought to transform the ruins of the Ottoman Empire into a modern, democratic, secular, nation-state. The principles of Atatürk's reforms are often referred to as Kemalism and continue to form the political foundation of the modern Turkish state.
Thus, Turkey today stands as a dominantly muslim country but secular. Being one of the most advanced muslim country, we can see a parallel relationship between those nations that adopt secular governance and those that adopt hudud laws.
For the benefit of all Malaysians, including muslims, Malaysia is better off with her current constitution. It may not be perfect, but it can be challenged and modified.